Yuku free message boards

I personally think it's John's site and he can produce the content if he chooses to. The strength, in case you haven't noticed, is in the links.

Should we open up the content to allow the most prolific writers to turn this place into another Waldorf Answers - or PLANS for that matter? Or would the articles you propose require approval? Then you're back to non-open content.

Re: the forums... Any site that is based in Anthroposophy is a closed site. There are NO open sites to discuss Anthroposophy or Waldorf - anywhere (if you know of one, I'd love to hear about it). Critical voices are squashed at Anthroposophy-based lists - they have been since the internet started. OpenWaldorf isn't perfect, but discussion on both sides of the issue is permitted uncensored (if you ignore the occasional site melt-downs). The site owner is not, as far as I know, censoring any comments (John, if it is otherwise, now is the time to speak up). Sites like Anthroposophy Tomorrow, Anthroposophy World, blah blah... are run by Anthroposophists who control the content and membership. Critical sites have also banned members who are Anthroposophists.

So yes, be thankful for open forums. They are part of what distinguishes OpenWaldorf from other sites.

Pete